[Neuroimaging] When to use neurostars, and when not to

Chris Filo Gorgolewski krzysztof.gorgolewski at gmail.com
Thu Aug 27 13:36:00 CEST 2015

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>

> Hi Chris,
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Chris Filo Gorgolewski
> <krzysztof.gorgolewski at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > My 3 cents: Matthew, Bertrand - I would encourage you to give neurostars
> a
> > try. It really helps building the community and makes questions more
> > discoverable. There are some rough edges, but nothing we cannot work
> around.
> But my assertion (of course possibly false) is that the problems I'm
> talking about are structural to the approved answer format.   Do you
> think that's possible?
I don't think anyone pays attention to the "approved answer" on neurostars
right now since it's rarely used and there are only few cases with multiple
answers. However even if we turn off the "approved answer" feature it would
work better than a mailing list. At least in my opinion.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/neuroimaging/attachments/20150827/f78099c7/attachment.html>

More information about the Neuroimaging mailing list