[Neuroimaging] Python 3 statement

Matthew Brett matthew.brett at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 23:27:05 EST 2016

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Ariel Rokem <arokem at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I just learned about this statement this morning:
> http://www.python3statement.org/
> What do folks here think about this? Should we sign on to this?

Honestly, I suspect Chris is right, this is going to end in a world of
pain for us, if we drop 2.7 support before it has died a natural
death.   I doubt that we'd gain much either, because we'd have to
maintain a separate bug-fix only version for 2.7.

So I'd like to apply the same rules as we do for any other Python
version - when the cost of the features we are missing outweighs the
pain we're going to cause people by dropping the version, we drop the



More information about the Neuroimaging mailing list