[Neuroimaging] Python 2x or 3x?

[Gregory Lee]

Hi Nina,

I would recommend starting with Python 3.x at this point.  Although it took
several years, most scientific python packages now support both 2.7 and 3.x
at this point, so there is no real downside to starting with 3.  Nibabel is
definitely the way to go in terms of working with a range of neuroimaging
file formats on the python side.  In terms of working across different
APIs, that sounds like a fit to nipype which already has wrappers for many
software packages.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Nina de Lacy <delacyn at u.washington.edu>
wrote:

>
>
> Hi there:
>
> I'm a new-to-Python visitor from MATLAB/SPM land.
>
> I'd like to build an application that is essentially a python wrapper that
> integrates several APIs and can take SPM-generated masks as input.
>
> Does the group/list have any thoughts about Python 2x vs 3x and NiBabel in
> terms of integration with other APIs, integration with SPM and what the
> community is using out there?
>
> Thanks
> Nina
>
> This message and any attached files might contain confidential information
> protected by federal and state law. The information is intended only for
> the use of the individual(s) or entities originally named as addressees.
> The improper disclosure of such information may be subject to civil or
> criminal penalties. If this message reached you in error, please contact
> the sender and destroy this message. Disclosing, copying, forwarding, or
> distributing the information by unauthorized individuals or entities is
> strictly prohibited by law.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neuroimaging mailing list
> Neuroimaging at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/neuroimaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/neuroimaging/attachments/20161021/28af5467/attachment.html>