[Neuroimaging] JSON-LD and DICOM?

[Matthew Brett]

Hi Satra,

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Satrajit Ghosh <satra at mit.edu> wrote:
> hi matthew,
>
>>
>> > they are being transitioned off to scicrunch/interlex and i'm sure karl
>> > and
>> > i can put together a basic context for us.
>>
>> That would be very useful indeed.  Any idea of a time scale for that?
>
>
> let me talk to karl. this should be doable by middle of next week if not
> earlier.

Excellent - that would be very helpful.  Will y'all be able to define
the @types as well as the @ids ?  I guess that would be a lot more
work.

>> Right - or, as you noted in the current JSON header draft, we can make
>> ``dcm`` a prefix with its own context, within the context for the JSON
>> header extension:
>>
>> "@context": "http://nipy.org/nibabel/jhe-context.jsonld"
>>
>> where jhe-context.jsonld contains:
>>
>>          "@context": {
>>             "dcm": "http://nipy.org/nibabel/dicom-context.jsonld"
>>           },
>>
>> and the JSON header goes something like:
>>
>> "@context": "http://nipy.org/nibabel/jhe-context.jsonld",
>> "nipy_header_version": "1.0",
>> "dcm:Echo_Time": 45,
>>
>> etc.
>
>
> sounds good to me. for the non dicom terms we should describe them in a
> context with descriptions and data types as well.

Right - yes, the rest of the context would describe the terms native
to the header extension.

Cheers,

Matthew