[Neuroimaging] JSON-LD and DICOM?

[Chris Gorgolewski]

I wonder if in the future it would also make sense to:

1) add option of creating sidecar BIDS compatible JSON files into nibabel
(similar to what dcm2niix, dicm2nii, and mcverter are doing). This makes
some sense since nibabel will become a dicom to nifti converter after
dcmstack is merged.

2) store the same content in the header (for "future" compatibility) under
a different namespace than "dcm" (would that work Satra? How would an
example JSON-LD with both "dcm" and "bids" look like?)

Not a huge priority, but something to think about. I am very glad that
dcmstack is getting merged into nibabel.

Best,
Chris

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Satrajit Ghosh <satra at mit.edu> wrote:

> Excellent - that would be very helpful.  Will y'all be able to define
>> the @types as well as the @ids ?  I guess that would be a lot more
>> work.
>>
>
> it shouldn't be too hard to combine it with this:
>
> https://github.com/pydicom/pydicom/blob/master/pydicom/_dicom_dict.py
>
> which itself is generated from the dicom standard and private dictionaries
> (these are not in karl's curation though and likely varies by sequence and
> scanner software versions).
>
> https://github.com/pydicom/pydicom/tree/master/source/generate_dict
>
> cheers,
>
> satra
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neuroimaging mailing list
> Neuroimaging at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/neuroimaging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/neuroimaging/attachments/20170704/498aa82c/attachment.html>