[Neuroimaging] JSON-LD and DICOM?

Andrey Fedorov andrey.fedorov at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 09:25:02 EDT 2017

Hi guys,

no, I don't think that file will be useful to you.

For us, the plan was to utilize that file as a central location to
link to the DICOM standard text and attribute definitions, but it has
not yet become a priority to organize this. We are focused on the
functionality and bug fixes for the library.

If you come up with something, I would be curious to see, although I
don't think that copying DICOM attributes to a NIfTI header is a good


On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Satrajit Ghosh <satra at mit.edu> wrote:
> hi matthew,
> i'm cc:ing andrey to check if he has one. her wrote a very brief one here:
> https://github.com/QIICR/dcmqi/blob/master/doc/definitions/dcmqi.jsonld
> cheers,
> satra
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm just in the middle of reviewing the JSON header proposal, we
>> discussed a while ago:
>> https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/nipy-devel/2014-July/010087.html
>> https://github.com/nipy/nibabel/wiki/json-header-extension
>> In particular, I'm returning to the problem of storing DICOM
>> information in the NIfTI header.
>> Satra - at the time, you proposed using JSON-LD, which does sound like
>> a good idea, but I was looking for a JSON-LD context for DICOM, and I
>> couldn't find one.  Does anyone know of any JSON-LD contexts for
>> Cheers,
>> Matthew
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neuroimaging mailing list
>> Neuroimaging at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/neuroimaging

More information about the Neuroimaging mailing list