[Neuroimaging] JSON-LD and DICOM?
andrey.fedorov at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 09:25:02 EDT 2017
no, I don't think that file will be useful to you.
For us, the plan was to utilize that file as a central location to
link to the DICOM standard text and attribute definitions, but it has
not yet become a priority to organize this. We are focused on the
functionality and bug fixes for the library.
If you come up with something, I would be curious to see, although I
don't think that copying DICOM attributes to a NIfTI header is a good
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Satrajit Ghosh <satra at mit.edu> wrote:
> hi matthew,
> i'm cc:ing andrey to check if he has one. her wrote a very brief one here:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com>
>> I'm just in the middle of reviewing the JSON header proposal, we
>> discussed a while ago:
>> In particular, I'm returning to the problem of storing DICOM
>> information in the NIfTI header.
>> Satra - at the time, you proposed using JSON-LD, which does sound like
>> a good idea, but I was looking for a JSON-LD context for DICOM, and I
>> couldn't find one. Does anyone know of any JSON-LD contexts for
>> Neuroimaging mailing list
>> Neuroimaging at python.org
More information about the Neuroimaging