[New-bugs-announce] [issue6066] POP_MARK was not in pickle protocol 0
report at bugs.python.org
Wed May 20 03:31:13 CEST 2009
New submission from Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com>:
Lib/pickletools.py incorrectly thinks POP_MARK was part of protocol 0;
POP_MARK was only added with the introduction of protocol 1 in r7753.
This mistake led me down a dead end while fixing another pickling issue.
Alexandre, can you double-check me on this? Feel free to bounce this
back if you don't have time.
I'll port this to py3k. I'm leaning toward a backport to 2.6; any
thoughts on that?
components: Library (Lib)
keywords: easy, patch
nosy: alexandre.vassalotti, collinwinter
stage: patch review
title: POP_MARK was not in pickle protocol 0
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14020/pickletools.patch
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
More information about the New-bugs-announce