[New-bugs-announce] [issue26666] File object hook to modify select(ors) event mask
Zack Weinberg
report at bugs.python.org
Tue Mar 29 11:28:41 EDT 2016
New submission from Zack Weinberg:
This is pretty esoteric, please bear with me. I'm attempting to enhance a transparent-SOCKS module (https://github.com/Anorov/PySocks) to support non-blocking connect(). This means, you should be able to do this:
socks.set_default_proxy(socks.SOCKS5, "localhost")
s = socks.socksocket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.setblocking(False)
err = s.connect_ex(address)
if err == errno.EINPROGRESS:
select.select([], [s], []) # returns when connection completes
Note the position of s in the select() arguments: the documented behavior of non-blocking connect(), at the operating system level, is that the socket will become *writable* when the connection resolves (whether successfully or not). However, in this case, under the hood, the socket is *already connected* -- to the proxy server -- after socksocket() returns. When connect_ex() returns EINPROGRESS, the thing we're really waiting for is a SOCKS-protocol reply message, i.e. the socket needs to become *readable* before the application can continue. An application that used the above code (with a hypothetical version of PySocks where this was supported) would get woken up immediately, since the initial SOCKS client->server message doesn't even come close to filling up the TCP send buffer.
There's no practical way to hide this divergence with the current library. What would be needed, I think, is a pair of new special methods on filelikes, which rewrite the set of events to listen for and the set of events to report. Hypothetical, for my use case:
def __preselect__(self, events):
if not self._connecting: return events
return selectors.EVENT_READ
def __postselect__(self, events):
if not self._connecting: return events
return selectors.EVENT_WRITE
(I'm using the high-level selectors.EVENT_* constants for illustration. This needs to happen in the low-level select-module methods, because callers can't be expected to use selectors.)
There are a bunch of awkward corner cases to worry about with this, and I'm not even sure the feature is worth it, but I thought I'd write up the problem and see what other people think.
----------
components: IO
messages: 262612
nosy: zwol
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: File object hook to modify select(ors) event mask
type: enhancement
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26666>
_______________________________________
More information about the New-bugs-announce
mailing list