[New-bugs-announce] [issue29921] datetime validation is stricter in 3.6.1 than previous versions

m-parry report at bugs.python.org
Mon Mar 27 09:48:47 EDT 2017


New submission from m-parry:

The change in issue #29100 - intended AFAICS simply to fix a regression in 3.6 - seems to have made datetime validation via certain code paths stricter than it was in 2.7 or 3.5. I think it's the case that some routes via the C API now reject out of range values that were previously permitted. Even if this previous behaviour was incorrect, was it intentional to alter that in a maintenance release?

Here's a quick example using pywin32:

---

> import getpass, sspi, sspicon, win32security
> client_name = getpass.getuser()
> auth_info = (client_name, 'wherever.com', None)
> pkg_info = win32security.QuerySecurityPackageInfo('Kerberos')
> win32security.AcquireCredentialsHandle(
>     client_name, pkg_info['Name'],
>     sspicon.SECPKG_CRED_OUTBOUND,
>     None, auth_info)

ValueError: year 30828 is out of range

---

Of course, this is probably a mishandling of the 'never expires' value returned by the Windows API in this case, and indeed I have also created a pywin32 ticket. However, I'm guessing that the linked issue wasn't supposed to break such code.

----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 290609
nosy: m-parry
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: datetime validation is stricter in 3.6.1 than previous versions
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.6

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29921>
_______________________________________


More information about the New-bugs-announce mailing list