[Numpy-discussion] PS: underflow array([2.9e-131+0j])**3 (why complex give a different result? bug?)
jbaddor at physics.mcgill.ca
Thu May 31 19:09:03 EDT 2001
Hey Numpy people!
This a PS from my previous message. I just tried the underflow with
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
OverflowError: math range error
Now I have a quick solution for my problem, but I have the impression that
this is a bug, at least I don't understand the underlying logic. If
somebody can explain it to me?
More information about the NumPy-Discussion