[Numpy-discussion] Question about numarray Bool type
Todd Miller
jmiller at stsci.edu
Tue May 6 14:21:54 EDT 2003
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 12:16, Francesc Alted wrote:
> Mensaje citado por: Peter Verveer <verveer at embl-heidelberg.de>:
> > > >That would be somewhat
> > > >simpler if Bool is always garantueed to be either a unsigned or a
> > signed
> > > > char type.
> > >
> > > I think perhaps we should just re-define Bool as signed char. Any
> > other
> > > opinions?
> >
> > That would solve the problem.
>
> I'm in the same position than Peter. I would definitively prefer a standard C
> type for booleans.
>
> Francesc Alted
>
I re-defined Bool as signed char in CVS. Without any real expertise in
Boolology <ahem>, I am unqualified to comment further. Let me know if
you would like something different.
Todd
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
> www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
--
Todd Miller jmiller at stsci.edu
STSCI / ESS / SSB
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list