[Numpy-discussion] Response to PEP suggestions
rlw at stsci.edu
Thu Feb 17 14:22:22 EST 2005
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, David M. Cooke wrote:
> I come from a C background, so things like Float64, etc., look wrong.
> I think more in terms of single- and double-precision, so I think
> adding some more descriptive types:
> CInt (would be either Int32 or Int64, depending on the platform)
> CFloat (can't do Float, for backwards-compatibility reasons)
> CDouble (could just be Double)
> CLong (or Long)
> CLongLong (or LongLong)
> That could make it easier to match types in Python code to types in C
Good choice of names.
> Oh, and the Python types int and float should be allowed (especially
> if you want this to go in the core!).
Say, I like that idea. And maybe, like float and int, the numeric types
could be callable to construct numeric arrays of that type, e.g.,
a = numeric3.Int16([1,2,3])
More information about the NumPy-Discussion