[Numpy-discussion] Response to PEP suggestions
konrad.hinsen at laposte.net
konrad.hinsen at laposte.net
Sat Feb 19 14:57:23 EST 2005
On 19.02.2005, at 15:28, Robert Kern wrote:
> Except that these types probably can't be derived from the builtin
> int. The C layouts would have to be compatible. They'd probably have
> to be a separate hierarchy.
They could all derive from a common (yet-to-be-written) base class that
has no data layout at all.
> True. However, if we introduce a bona fide TypeObject hierarchy for
> numerical scalars that *can* be profitably used outside of the array
> context, it's *going* to be used outside of the array context. If it
> gets into the
True, though I expect its use to be limited to the numeric community.
> standard library, it can't just be a large number hierarchy for our
> use; it will have to be *the* number hierarchy for Python and include
> PyLongObjects and decimals and rationals.
That would be preferable indeed.
> And that's probably a bit more than we care to deal with to get
> multiarrays into the core.
It all depends on the reaction of the Python developer community. We
won't know before asking.
Konrad.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Konrad Hinsen
Laboratoire Leon Brillouin, CEA Saclay,
91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
Tel.: +33-1 69 08 79 25
Fax: +33-1 69 08 82 61
E-Mail: khinsen at cea.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list