[Numpy-discussion] Trying out Numeric3
verveer at embl.de
Fri Mar 25 11:54:14 EST 2005
>> This could be made a bit simpler by allowing only contiguous arrays,
>> but then there would need to be a contiguous flag.
> I'm thinking just contiguous arrays would be passed. While Numeric
> does support the multi-segment buffer interface. I doubt extension
> writers want to try and understand how to deal with it. I think it
> would be too much of a burden to other extensions if the array they
> saw was not contiguous. Even internal to Numeric, discontiguous
> arrays are made contiguous all the time (although the new iterator in
> Numeric3 makes it much easier for a programmer to deal with
> discontiguous arrays).
It think it would be a real shame not to support non-contiguous data.
It would be great if such a byte object could be used instead of
Numeric/numarray arrays when writing extensions. Then I could write C
extensions that could be made available very easily/efficiently to any
package supporting it without having to worry about the specific C api
of those packages. If only contiguous byte objects are supported that
byte object is not a good option anymore for implementing extensions
for Numeric unless I am prepared to live with a lot of copying of
More information about the NumPy-Discussion