[Numpy-discussion] Performance of the array protocol
Travis Oliphant
oliphant at ee.byu.edu
Tue Nov 1 12:39:41 EST 2005
David M. Cooke wrote:
>"C
>
>I had posted an idea before:
>
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/2159
>
>It would still be one attribute lookup, but then everything would be
>C-based from there on.
>
>
Thanks for reminding us of your idea again. This is a very good idea,
that I think we could add. My only question is should Py_LONG_LONG be
used or Py_intptr_t? Since the array has to be in memory anyway there
does not seem any advantage to using Py_LONG_LONG.
I also think a flags member of the structure is useful along with a
typestr instead of typecode. I would say the C-struct should look
like. We could push to get something like this in Python core, I think,
so this Array_Interface header was available to everybody.
typedef struct {
int nd;
char typekind;
int itemsize;
int flags;
Py_intptr_t *shape;
Py_intptr_t *strides;
Py_intptr_t offset;
void *data;
} PyArray_Interface
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list