[Numpy-discussion] Args for ones, zeros, rand, eye, ones, empty (possible 1.0 change?)
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 18:51:17 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Args for ones, zeros, rand, eye, ones, empty (possible 1.0 change?)
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Args for ones, zeros, rand, eye, ones, empty (possible 1.0 change?)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
<snip>
+1 for tuples,
Because dimensions *are* tuples. I think using tuples is a good habit to get
into and agree with Robert Kern's comments about using the new random number
interface instead of the old compatibility functions rand and randn.
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20060703/6a18e9ce/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Args for ones, zeros, rand, eye, ones, empty (possible 1.0 change?)
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Args for ones, zeros, rand, eye, ones, empty (possible 1.0 change?)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list