[Numpy-discussion] Don't like the short names like lstsq and irefft

[Alexandre Fayolle]

On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:43:42AM +0200, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> > Again, there is no defense for abbreviating linear_least_squares
> > because it is unlikely to appear in an expression and waste valuable
> > horisontal space.  
> 
> not true imho; btw, I would suggest "ols" (ordinary least squares),
> which is in every textbook.

Please, keep the zen of python in mind : Explicit is better than
implicit. 

-- 
Alexandre Fayolle                              LOGILAB, Paris (France)
Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian:  http://www.logilab.fr/formations
Développement logiciel sur mesure:       http://www.logilab.fr/services
Informatique scientifique:               http://www.logilab.fr/science
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20060616/e85bc34f/attachment.sig>