[Numpy-discussion] rand argument question

Sven Schreiber svetosch at gmx.net
Sat Jun 3 05:52:57 EDT 2006

Robert Kern schrieb:

> My point is that there is no need to change rand() and randn() to the "new"
> interface. The "new" interface is already there: random.random() and
> random.standard_normal().

Ok thanks for the responses and sorry for not searching the archives
about this.
I tend to share Alan's point of view, but I also understand that it may
be too late now to change the way rand is called.

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list