[Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0

Travis N. Vaught travis at enthought.com
Fri Jun 30 12:40:14 EDT 2006

Sasha wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems.  We all know
>> that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest
>> routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
> Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy
> unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.
Very obviously a joke...uh...with the exception of enthought-written 
scientific code, of course ;-)

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list