[Numpy-discussion] NumPy/SciPy LAPACK version

Kevin Jacobs <jacobs@bioinformed.com> bioinformed at gmail.com
Mon Jul 16 13:40:25 EDT 2007


On 7/16/07, Kevin Jacobs <jacobs at bioinformed.com> <bioinformed at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> This is a bit of a SciPy question, but I thought I'd ask here since I'm
> already subscribed.  I'd like to add some new LAPACK bindings to SciPy and
> was wondering if there was a minimum version requirement for LAPACK, since
> it would be ideal if I could use some of the newer 3.0 features.  In
> addition to using some block methods only added in 3.0, it is very
> convenient to use the WORK=-1 for space queries instead of reimplementing
> the underlying logic in the calc_work module.
>
> The routines of most interest to me are:
> DGELSD
> DGGGLM
> DGGLSE
>
STEGR

Thanks for all of the feedback on sqrtm.  Can anyone comment on the
suitability of adding LAPACK 3.0 functions to SciPy.LinAlg?  I need to do
the work regardless, but being able to contribute it back would be very
nice.

-Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20070716/140a3427/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list