[Numpy-discussion] output arguments
robert.kern at gmail.com
Mon Jul 23 23:50:47 EDT 2007
Thomas Breuel wrote:
> core NumPy doesn't seem to support a lot of output arguments, or common
> composite operations. For example, a common operation is something like
> a = outer(b,c)
> a += outer(b,c)
> There are some workarounds, but they aren't pretty. Consistently
> providing output arguments throughout NumPy would help; is there any
> reason this isn't being done?
> For example, it would be nice if "outer"
> or maybe one could specify an accumulation ufunc, with addition,
> multiplication, min, and max being fast, and with an optional scale
What would the increment and scale parameters do? Why should they be part of the
outer() interface? Have you looked at the .outer() method on the add, multiply,
minimum, and maximum ufuncs?
> Another approach might be to provide, in addition to the convenient
> high-level NumPy operations, direct bindings for BLAS and/or similar
> libraries, with Fortran-like procedural interfaces, but I can't find any
> such libraries in NumPy or SciPy. Am I missing something?
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the NumPy-Discussion