[Numpy-discussion] Documentation
Alan G Isaac
aisaac at american.edu
Fri May 18 15:49:33 EDT 2007
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Charles R Harris apparently wrote:
> reST seems to be compatible with all three programs, so
> that is an excellent base. What I am searching for is some
> consensus as to what the documentation template should
> look like.
I hope this is not too off topic. It seems that there is at
least one question for Enthought here:
since epydoc has the MIT license,
why not work on making epydoc traits aware instead of
developing endo separately?
I assume that an answer to that question will provide lots
of relevant information?
Cheers,
Alan Isaac
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list