[Numpy-discussion] Documentation

Alan G Isaac aisaac at american.edu
Fri May 18 15:49:33 EDT 2007


On Fri, 18 May 2007, Charles R Harris apparently wrote: 
> reST seems to be compatible with all three programs, so 
> that is an excellent base. What I am searching for is some 
> consensus as to what the documentation template should 
> look like. 

I hope this is not too off topic.  It seems that there is at 
least one question for Enthought here:
since epydoc has the MIT license,
why not work on making epydoc traits aware instead of 
developing endo separately?

I assume that an answer to that question will provide lots
of relevant information?

Cheers,
Alan Isaac






More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list