[Numpy-discussion] NumPy trunk is frozen for upcoming 1.0.4 release
woiski at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 07:05:28 EST 2007
Thanks. I will try them later and let you know. Any chance to have those for
2.4 as well?:)
If it works, I will be able to upgrade to matplotlib 0.90.1....
On Nov 6, 2007 5:25 AM, David Cournapeau <david at ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
> Emanuel Woiski wrote:
> > On Nov 4, 2007 6:18 PM, Jarrod Millman <millman at berkeley.edu
> > <mailto:millman at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
> > On Nov 4, 2007 11:53 AM, Emanuel Woiski <woiski at gmail.com
> > <mailto:woiski at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > I am havig a lot of trouble for quite some time wih numpy -
> > scipy Windows
> > > binaries for old AMD (pre-XP) processors. Since I teach in a lab
> > with lots
> > > of machines using that kind of processor, I got stuck with numpy
> > 1.0rc2 and
> > > scipy 0.5.1, which is, believe me, the only combination that
> > woks...Well not
> > > only tests fail but Python crashes!
> > > FYI there are many people over the world still using not-so-recent
> > > computers...
> > > Yes I have tried s0.6 and n22.214.171.124 without success.
> > Are you building from source? If so, have you tried the most recent
> > development code?
> > Nope, just WinXP (and WIn2000) binaries....
> The problem is a distribution problem (that is how the binaries were
> built). Do you need optimized BLAS/LAPACK (for fast linear algebra) ? If
> not, would you mind trying those ?
> Note that those do not use any optimized libraries (no ATLAS, no fftw,
> etc...). This is the bare minimal to make it work on any x86 machine (no
> need for SSE/SSE2).
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at scipy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion