[Numpy-discussion] weibull distribution has only one parameter?

D.Hendriks (Dennis) D.Hendriks at tue.nl
Mon Nov 12 11:44:36 EST 2007

Alan G Isaac wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, "D.Hendriks (Dennis)" apparently wrote: 
>>All of this makes me doubt the correctness of the formula 
>>you proposed. 
>It is always a good idea to hesitate before doubting Robert.
>Alan Isaac
So, you are saying that it was indeed correct? That still leaves the 
question why I can't seem to confirm that in the figure I mentioned (red 
and green lines). Also, if you refer to X = lambda*(-ln(U))^(1/k) as 
'proof' for the validity of the formula, I have to ask if 
Weibull(a,Size) does actually correspond to (-ln(U))^(1/a)?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20071112/dbd0e39b/attachment.html>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list