[Numpy-discussion] Py3K
Fernando Perez
fperez.net at gmail.com
Tue Apr 15 18:53:07 EDT 2008
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, and making the transition will be made a lot easier by having a complete
> set of tests. Getting the tests and documentation into good state might be
> the best focus for our 1.2 effort.
+1
Bonus points for whoever adds coverage reporting to our test suite, so
that we can get at least basic metrics of coverage by:
- docstrings
- doctests
- plain tests
Even if imperfect, having some kind of metric to trac progress on this
front would be useful, I think.
Nose does have a coverage plugin, but unfortunately it seems that
coverage and doctests don't totally play nice in nose:
http://www.somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/doc/plugin_doctests.html
(see comment in code). I don't know enough about the details of this
to say much more...
Cheers,
f
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list