[Numpy-discussion] Py3K

Ondrej Certik ondrej at certik.cz
Wed Apr 16 10:06:29 EDT 2008


On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za> wrote:
> On 16/04/2008, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Charles R Harris
>
> > > Oh, and making the transition will be made a lot easier by having a complete
>  >  > set of tests. Getting the tests and documentation into good state might be
>  >  > the best focus for our 1.2 effort.
>  >
>  >
>  > +1
>  >
>  >  Bonus points for whoever adds coverage reporting to our test suite, so
>  >  that we can get at least basic metrics of coverage by:
>  >
>  >  - docstrings
>  >  - doctests
>  >  - plain tests
>
>  I'd love to see that.  In the meantime, here is a figleaf coverage report:
>
>  http://mentat.za.net/numpy/coverage/

Wow, figleaf is really cool. I didn't know about this tool.

Ondrej


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list