[Numpy-discussion] Generalized ufuncs?
Travis E. Oliphant
oliphant at enthought.com
Fri Aug 15 02:35:37 EDT 2008
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
>> Can we fix the ticket notification mailings some day? It's been almost
>> four months now.
>>
> That would be fabulous. So far nobody has figured out how... Jarrod??
>
>> Re: the patch. I noticed the replacement of the signed type int by an
>> unsigned size_t.
>>
> Where did you notice this? I didn't see it.
>
Are you referring to Stefan's patch to the Fu's _parse_signature code in
r5654. This is a local function, I'm not sure why there is a concern.
>> python or numpy types. The use of inline and the local declaration of
>> variables would also have been caught early in a code review.
>>
> What do you mean by the local declaration of variables?
>
>
Never mind, I understand it's the mid-code declaration of variables
(without a separate block defined) that Stefan fixed.
-Travis
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list