[Numpy-discussion] immutable numpy arrays
Geoffrey Irving
irving at naml.us
Wed Dec 17 16:52:02 EST 2008
Currently numpy arrays are either writable or unwritable, but
unwritable arrays can still be changed through other copies. This
means that when a numpy array is passed into an interface that
requires immutability for safety reasons, a copy always has to be
made.
One way around this would be to add a NPY_IMMUTABLE flag signifying
that the contents of the array will never change through other copies.
This flag would be in addition to the current NPY_WRITEABLE flag, so
it would be fully backwards compatible. The flag would be propagated
along slices and views.
For example, a numpy array created from C code that guarantees
immutability would have the flag set. If the array was passed back
into a function that required an immutable array, the code could check
the immutable flag and skip the copy. This behavior could also be
used to implement safe copy-on-write semantics.
Making this more generally useful would probably require additional
flags to document whether a writeable copy of the array might exists
(something like NPY_LEAKED) in order to avoid copies for newly created
writeable arrays.
Has the issue of immutability been considered before? It seems like a
basic NPY_IMMUTABLE flag would be fairly easy to add without backwards
compatibility issues, but the secondary features such as NPY_LEAKED
would be more complicated.
Thanks,
Geoffrey
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list