[Numpy-discussion] CFLAGS, LDFLAGS, appending and overwriting: what should be the behavior of numscons ?
David Cournapeau
david at ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Wed Feb 20 01:51:43 EST 2008
Hi,
I would like to know what the UI should be for numscons wrt to
compilation / link flags. This is an issue which has confused many
people with distutils, and something we can fix with numscons. Several
approaches are possible for numscons, but I was wondering about the
preferred behavior.
Right now, by default:
- using CFLAGS will only change debug/warning/optimization flags
(that is, you can't remove -fPIC with CFLAGS on platforms which need
it). I understand than totally overwriting the flags should also be
possible (e.g. the current *distutils* behavior). Is handling new
compilers the only reason, in which case a better solution is available
for numscons through scons tools ?
- using LDFLAGS: I do not use it right now. Is anything needed on
this front ?
More generally, since numscons is easier to use now thanks to the
merge into the numpy trunk, and can work on all major platforms since
0.4.1 release, I am interested in getting feedback from numpy developers
as well. Internally, I tried to make as few choices as possible, so it
should be quite flexible wrt things difficult to handle with distutils.
thanks,
David
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list