[Numpy-discussion] problem with NumPy test harness in 1.1.0?

[David Brown]

Thanks for the input Fernando.
  -dave

On Jul 1, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 18:39, David Brown <dbrown at ucar.edu> wrote:
>>> OK, thanks for the info Robert.
>>> Any recommendations for another test harness?
>>
>> numpy and scipy are moving to nose as of numpy 1.2 and scipy 0.7.
>>
>>  http://www.somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/
>>
>> It has been a personal favorite of mine for some time, too.
>
> So has ipython recently, for what it's worth.  It does make easy a lot
> of things that should be easy but aren't under unittest, which is a
> big plus in my view.  We also adopted it after advice from Robert,
> others at Enthought and Titus Brown during a BOF session at last
> year's SciPy.
>
> The fact that nose absorbs/recognizes all regular unittest tests makes
> the transition fairly easy.
>
> Cheers,
>
> f
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at scipy.org
> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion