[Numpy-discussion] 1.1.1rc1 to be tagged tonight

[Charles R Harris]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>
> wrote:
>
>> 2008/7/22 Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>:
>> >> Could you post a patch against current mainline svn, which already has
>> your
>> >> previous patch applied? I'm also curious why we need tuples, are we
>> using
>> >> these values as hashes someplace.
>> >
>> > Applied.  The reason we need to use tuples is because
>>
>> Should these changes be back-ported to the 1.1.1 branch?
>>
>
> That's what I'm trying out now that I've got Python2.3 installed for
> testing. What I'd like to do is just copy the whole io.py file over. Let's
> see if Trac is working... OK, the only other change since 1.1.0 is using
> np.x in the doctests, which doesn't look like a big problem. I wonder what
> the status of that is in 1.1.x? Alan?
>

OK, io.py seems to work. However, there are two other problems showing up in
2.3:

Failed importing numpy.f2py.lib.extgen: update() takes no keyword arguments

Failed importing
/usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/numpy/ma/tests/test_mrecords.py:
invalid syntax (mrecords.py, line 245)

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080722/95c1bdef/attachment.html>