[Numpy-discussion] 1.1.1rc1 to be tagged tonight

[Charles R Harris]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Alan McIntyre <alan.mcintyre at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK, the only other change since 1.1.0 is using
> > np.x in the doctests, which doesn't look like a big problem. I wonder
> what
> > the status of that is in 1.1.x? Alan?
>
> All the changes I made for that were in the trunk after 1.1.1 was
> tagged, so the 1.1.1 test behavior should be completely under the old
> framework's rules.  I could probably backport the np.x context to
> rundocs() (off the top of my head I can't remember if there was any
> mechanism to run all the doctests in NumPy), but it might just be
> easier to add "import numpy as np" to the modules containing doctests
> that use np.x.  I can help with that if need be, just let me know.


If we do a 1.1.2 it might be handy for future backports if rundocs() has the
np.x context. For the moment I'm tempted to just leave them as they don't
look any worse than than they were, i.e., assuming from numpy import *

Thanks,

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080722/d4a832e6/attachment.html>