[Numpy-discussion] missing function in numpy.ma?

[Charles Doutriaux]

Hi Pierre,

No problem, let me know when you have something in. I can't be sure all 
I mentioned is all that's missing. It's all I got so far.
But since I can't get our end going. I can't really give you a 
comprehensive list of what's exactly missing. Hopefully this is all and 
it will work fine after your changes.

Thanks for doing this,

C.

Pierre GM wrote:
> Charles,
>
>   
>> all i was saying is that 1.0.4 was working great with the small
>> compatibility layer.
>> I even have a frozen version of 1.0.5 devel that works great. Then
>> suddenly everything broke.
>>     
>
> Could you be more specific ? Would you mind sending me bug reports so that I 
> can check what's going on and how to improve backwards compatibility ?
>
>   
>> I was really happy was the layer of 1.0.4.
>>     
>
> We're talking about the 15-line long numpy.oldnumeric.ma, right ? The ones 
> that redefines "take" as to take the averages along some indices ? The only 
> difference between versions is that 1.0.5 uses numpy.ma instead of the old 
> numpy.core.ma. 
> [...]
> OK, now I see: there were some functions in numpy.core.ma that are not in 
> numpy.ma (identity, indices). So, the pb is not in the conversion layer, but 
> on numpy.ma itself. OK, that should be relatively easy to fix. Can you gimme 
> a day or two ? 
>
> Sorry for the delayed comprehension.
> P.
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at scipy.org
> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>