[Numpy-discussion] missing function in numpy.ma?

[Jarrod Millman]

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Travis E. Oliphant
<oliphant at enthought.com> wrote:
>  If this works then it should be fine.  If it doesn't, however, then it
>  would not be too big a deal to just move the old implementation over.
>  In fact, I rather think it ought to be done anyway.

My main concern is that we shouldn't release 1.0.5 with known missing
functionality in the new implementation of MaskedArrays.