[Numpy-discussion] SIGFPE handling in ufunc

[David Cournapeau]

David Cournapeau wrote:
> Note that no warning is raised - this seems to be a regression, since I
> came across e.g. this ticket: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/541.
>   

Ok, this is broken since 1.1.0 (r4778 to be exact), and the reason is
the MaskedArray support - there are some global seterr calls without the
old state being restored. Look easy to fix,

cheers,

David