[Numpy-discussion] Reminder: code freeze for bet at the end of the WE

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 14:04:18 EDT 2009


On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:52 AM, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > The fixes look small and I'd like them to go in. Can you put together
> some
> > short tests for these fixes? Would it help if you had commit privileges
> in
> > Numpy?
>
> Yes, I was about to suggest giving Josef commit access to numpy, I
> unfortunately won't have much time to do anything but release tasks in
> the next few days, including review. If someone else (you :) ) can
> review the changes, before they go in, then there is no reason why
> they can't go in - assuming they come in very soon,
>

The fixes are both one-liners. Testing... I wonder if tests for things like
random distributions and computational accuracy of special functions
shouldn't be separate scripts. They can be large file, ala special
functions, or time consuming and it doesn't help that parts are needed by
both scipy and numpy.

I don't feel competent to say that the fixes are correct, I'll trust Josef
in that regard.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20090314/e8fa3d65/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list