[Numpy-discussion] Solaris Sparc build broken

David Cournapeau cournape at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 18:37:35 EST 2009

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Michael Droettboom <mdroe at stsci.edu> wrote:
> I don't know if your 'long double' detection code is complete yet, but I
> thought I'd share the current build output on one of our Solaris
> machines.  It looks like it may just be a typo difference between
> 'IEEE_QUAD_BE' in long_double_representation() and 'IEEE_QUAD_16B_BE' in
> setup.py, but I wanted to confirm.

Yes, you're right - I don't have any machine with a 128 bits long
double type, so I let the typo slipped.

Could you try last revision (r7726) ?


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list