[Numpy-discussion] Removing datetime support for 1.4.x series ?

[Charles R Harris]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, David Cournapeau <david at silveregg.co.jp>wrote:

> Charles R Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM, David Cournapeau <david at silveregg.co.jp
> > <mailto:david at silveregg.co.jp>> wrote:
> >
> >     josef.pktd at gmail.com <mailto:josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >      > scipy is relatively easy to compile, I was thinking also of h5py,
> >      > pytables and pymc (b/c of pytables), none of them are importing
> with
> >      > numpy 1.4.0 because of the cython issue.
> >
> >     As I said, all of them will have to be regenerated with cython
> 0.12.1.
> >     There is no other solution,
> >
> >
> > Wait, won't the structures be the same size? If they are then the cython
> > check won't fail.
>
> Yes, but the structures are bigger (even after removing the datetime
> stuff, I had the cython warning when I did some tests).
>
>
That's curious. It sounds like it isn't ABI compatible yet. Any idea of what
was added? It would be helpful if the cython message gave a bit more
information...

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100211/741fb8be/attachment.html>