[Numpy-discussion] docstring suggestions

[Pierre GM]

On Feb 12, 2010, at 11:01 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Pierre GM <pgmdevlist at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:14 PM, David Goldsmith wrote
> 
> > Is the present issue an instance where Scott's second statement is invalid, an instance where its validity is resulting in a poor docstring for the function, or an instance in which Scott's "recommendation" was not followed?
> 
> The methods'  docstring are fine, but we could improve the way the corresponding function docstrings are created.
> 
> Does anyone have an idea of how universal of a problem this is (i.e., is it just confined to ma)?  

Likely to be just a numpy.ma issue. I'll try to find some kind of fix.