[Numpy-discussion] Efficient orthogonalisation with scipy/numpy
gael.varoquaux at normalesup.org
Tue Jan 19 16:12:36 EST 2010
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:58:32PM -0600, Robert Kern wrote:
> > I am not sure that what I am doing is optimal.
> If confounds is orthonormal, then there is no need to use lstsq().
> y = y - np.dot(np.dot(confounds, y), confounds)
Unfortunately, confounds is not orthonormal, and as it is different at
each call, I cannot orthogonalise it as a preprocessing.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion