[Numpy-discussion] Adding an ndarray.dot method

[David Goldsmith]

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav at iki.fi> wrote:

> Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:12:07 -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> [clip]
> > Here is a related ticket that proposes a more explicit alternative:
> > adding a ``dot`` method to ndarray.
> > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1456
>
> I kind of like this idea. Simple, obvious, and leads
> to clear code:
>
>        a.dot(b).dot(c)
>
> or in another multiplication order,
>
>        a.dot(b.dot(c))
>
> And here's an implementation:
>
>
> http://github.com/pv/numpy-work/commit/414429ce0bb0c4b7e780c4078c5ff71c113050b6
>
> I think I'm going to apply this, unless someone complains,


I have a big one: NO DOCSTRING!!!  We're just perpetuating the errors of the
past people!  Very discouraging!

DG


> as I
> don't see any downsides (except maybe adding one more to the
> huge list of methods ndarray already has).
>
> Cheers,
> Pauli
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>



-- 
Mathematician: noun, someone who disavows certainty when their uncertainty
set is non-empty, even if that set has measure zero.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100504/68f7344f/attachment.html>