[Numpy-discussion] Schedule for 1.5.1?

[Charles R Harris]

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris
> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Ralf Gommers <
> ralf.gommers at googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Pierre GM <pgmdevlist at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just asking,
> >>> Should I backport some bugs that were corrected in 2.0 for numpy.ma ?
> I
> >>> don't have any particular in mind, but I'm sure there must be some...
> >>>
> >> That would be helpful. Please backport any bug fixes that you think are
> >> important.
> >>
> >
> > IIRC, there was also a fix that Josef wanted in one of the stats
> functions
> > before 1.5 but I don't remember which. Josef?
>
> Not sure, The only things that I remember right now is that Alan
> wanted to have ddof instead of bias in cov for consistency in names
> across functions, and the usual
>
> >>> np.nansum([])
> 1.#QNAN
> >>> np.nansum([np.nan])
> 1.#QNAN
>
> Both will change current behavior and might need a depreciation cycle.
>
> I have to see if a search through the mailing list turns something up.
>
>
I think it was something about Pareto...

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20101008/aa29e10e/attachment.html>