[Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

Christoph Gohlke cgohlke at uci.edu
Wed Apr 20 21:37:33 EDT 2011



On 4/20/2011 1:55 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Christoph Gohlke<cgohlke at uci.edu>  wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/17/2011 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful:
>>>
>>> - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any
>>> further with this?)
>>> - #1801: test_noncentral_f failure on win64
>>> - #1798: type promotion regression (needs review,
>>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/73)
>>> - API docs for new parameters to ufuncs (full list: 'casting', 'out',
>>> 'order', 'subok', 'dtype'),
>>> - API docs, some docstrings and update of NEP for datetime
>>>
>>> I'm planning to release the first release candidate next weekend if
>>> these are solved.  As far as I know no one is working on the doc
>>> issues right now. It would be great if someone could step up and do
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ralf
>>
>>
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>> I submitted a patch for issue #1801. All tests now pass on win-amd64-py3.2
>> with numpy 1.6.x from git.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
>> Would it be possible to get the attached patch for scipy ticket #678
>> <http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/678>  into numpy 1.6? The
>> fix/workaround for the scipy ODR failures is to change the ifort
>> optimization flag from /O3 to /O1.
>
> Several other people already ran into this, so it would probably still
> good to change this for 1.6.0. This change is part of a proposed
> patch: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1378. Do any of the
> other changes there look relevant too?
>
> Ralf

The changes for the Intel Visual Fortran Compiler looks OK. '/Qip' is 
the default option, and '/Qipo','/Qipo_obj' have already been removed 
some time ago.

I have not used older Intel Fortran compilers but the '-xHOST' switch 
does not seem apt.

Christoph



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list