[Numpy-discussion] status for 1.6.0

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Sat Apr 23 15:09:18 EDT 2011


On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers at googlemail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Wiebe <mwwiebe at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers <
> ralf.gommers at googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful:
> >>
> >> - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any
> >> further with this?)
> >> - #1801: test_noncentral_f failure on win64
> >> - #1798: type promotion regression (needs review,
> >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/73)
> >
> > I've pushed this change, anyone interested should review the tests for
> this
> > to verify that it accords with their intuition:
> >
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/maintenance%2F1.6.x/numpy/core/tests/test_numeric.py#L372
> >>
> >> - API docs for new parameters to ufuncs (full list: 'casting', 'out',
> >> 'order', 'subok', 'dtype'),
> >
> > Done.
>
> Great, thanks.
> >
> >>
> >> - API docs, some docstrings and update of NEP for datetime
> >>
> >> I'm planning to release the first release candidate next weekend if
> >> these are solved.  As far as I know no one is working on the doc
> >> issues right now. It would be great if someone could step up and do
> >> this.
> >
> > There's a new ticket #1805 which should get fixed for the RC too.
>
> Charles already attached a patch to #1805, it would be great if you
> could review that. If the fix is correct we're good to go.
>
>
Oh, that just makes numpy run. It doesn't run correctly, though, there are
lots of failing tests. The patch is a work in progress and is up for review
and tinkering.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110423/ae20c974/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list