[Numpy-discussion] Getting non-normalized eigenvectors from generalized eigenvalue solution?
Olivier Delalleau
shish at keba.be
Tue Dec 20 22:15:51 EST 2011
What I don't get is that "un-normalized" eigenvectors can be pretty much
anything. If you care about the specific output of Matlab / Octave, it
means you understand the particular "un-normalization" that these programs
use. In that case you should be able to recover it from the normalized
output from numpy.
-=- Olivier
2011/12/20 Fahreddın Basegmez <mangabasi at gmail.com>
> I don't think I can do that. I can go to the normalized results but not
> the other way.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Olivier Delalleau <shish at keba.be> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, sorry, I don't see any obvious logic that would explain how Octave
>> obtains this result, although of course there is probably some logic...
>>
>> Anyway, since you seem to know what you want, can't you obtain the same
>> result by doing whatever un-normalizing operation you are after?
>>
>>
>> -=- Olivier
>>
>> 2011/12/20 Fahreddın Basegmez <mangabasi at gmail.com>
>>
>>> I should include the scipy response too I guess.
>>>
>>>
>>> scipy.linalg.eig(STIFM, MASSM)
>>> (array([ 3937.15984097+0.j, 3937.15984097+0.j, 3937.15984097+0.j,
>>> 3923.07692308+0.j, 3923.07692308+0.j, 7846.15384615+0.j]),
>>> array([[ 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
>>> [ 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
>>> [ 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0.],
>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0.],
>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0.],
>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1.]]))
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Fahreddın Basegmez <mangabasi at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I can get the same response as Matlab I would be all set.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Octave results
>>>>
>>>> >> STIFM
>>>> STIFM =
>>>>
>>>> Diagonal Matrix
>>>>
>>>> 1020 0 0 0 0 0
>>>> 0 1020 0 0 0 0
>>>> 0 0 1020 0 0 0
>>>> 0 0 0 102000 0 0
>>>> 0 0 0 0 102000 0
>>>> 0 0 0 0 0 204000
>>>>
>>>> >> MASSM
>>>> MASSM =
>>>>
>>>> Diagonal Matrix
>>>>
>>>> 0.25907 0 0 0 0 0
>>>> 0 0.25907 0 0 0 0
>>>> 0 0 0.25907 0 0 0
>>>> 0 0 0 26.00000 0 0
>>>> 0 0 0 0 26.00000 0
>>>> 0 0 0 0 0 26.00000
>>>>
>>>> >> [a, b] = eig(STIFM, MASSM)
>>>> a =
>>>>
>>>> 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.96468 0.00000 0.00000
>>>> 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.96468 0.00000
>>>> 0.00000 0.00000 1.96468 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
>>>> 0.19612 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
>>>> 0.00000 0.19612 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
>>>> 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.19612
>>>>
>>>> b =
>>>>
>>>> Diagonal Matrix
>>>>
>>>> 3923.1 0 0 0 0 0
>>>> 0 3923.1 0 0 0 0
>>>> 0 0 3937.2 0 0 0
>>>> 0 0 0 3937.2 0 0
>>>> 0 0 0 0 3937.2 0
>>>> 0 0 0 0 0 7846.2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Numpy Results
>>>>
>>>> >>> STIFM
>>>> array([[ 1020., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 1020., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 1020., 0., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 102000., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 0., 102000., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 204000.]])
>>>>
>>>> >>> MASSM
>>>>
>>>> array([[ 0.25907, 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0.
>>>> ],
>>>> [ 0. , 0.25907, 0. , 0. , 0. , 0.
>>>> ],
>>>> [ 0. , 0. , 0.25907, 0. , 0. , 0.
>>>> ],
>>>> [ 0. , 0. , 0. , 26. , 0. , 0.
>>>> ],
>>>> [ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 26. , 0.
>>>> ],
>>>> [ 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 0. , 26.
>>>> ]])
>>>>
>>>> >>> a, b = linalg.eig(dot( linalg.pinv(MASSM), STIFM))
>>>>
>>>> >>> a
>>>>
>>>> array([ 3937.15984097, 3937.15984097, 3937.15984097, 3923.07692308,
>>>> 3923.07692308, 7846.15384615])
>>>>
>>>> >>> b
>>>>
>>>> array([[ 1., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 1., 0., 0., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 1., 0., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0.],
>>>> [ 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1.]])
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Olivier Delalleau <shish at keba.be>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hmm... ok ;) (sorry, I can't follow you there)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, what kind of non-normalization are you after? I looked at the
>>>>> doc for Matlab and it just says eigenvectors are not normalized, without
>>>>> additional details... so it looks like it could be anything.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -=- Olivier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/12/20 Fahreddın Basegmez <mangabasi at gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am computing normal-mode frequency response of a mass-spring
>>>>>> system. The algorithm I am using requires it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Olivier Delalleau <shish at keba.be>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm probably missing something, but... Why would you want
>>>>>>> non-normalized eigenvectors?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -=- Olivier
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/12/20 Fahreddın Basegmez <mangabasi at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Howdy,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is it possible to get non-normalized eigenvectors from
>>>>>>>> scipy.linalg.eig(a, b)? Preferably just by using numpy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, Matlab/Octave provides this with its eig(a, b) function but I
>>>>>>>> would like to use numpy for obvious reasons.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fahri
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>>>>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>>>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20111220/8023d570/attachment.html>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list