[Numpy-discussion] fft help
torgil.svensson at gmail.com
Thu Dec 29 12:43:25 EST 2011
Sorry, i should have looked at your image. A few test you can do is
1) does ifft2 give you back the original image? (allclose returned
True for a little test I did here)
2) does scipy.fftpack.fft2 yield the same result?
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Burlen Loring <burlen.loring at gmail.com> wrote:
> hmmph, I used both fftn and fft2, they both produce the same result. Is
> there a restriction on the dimension of the input? power of 2 or some such?
> On 12/29/2011 07:21 AM, Torgil Svensson wrote:
>> This is because fft computes one-dimensional transforms (on each row).
>> Try fft2 instead.
>> fft(a, n=None, axis=-1)
>> Compute the one-dimensional discrete Fourier Transform.
>> fft2(a, s=None, axes=(-2, -1))
>> Compute the 2-dimensional discrete Fourier Transform
>> fftn(a, s=None, axes=None)
>> Compute the N-dimensional discrete Fourier Transform.
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Burlen Loring<burlen.loring at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have an image I need to do an fft on, I tried numpy.fft but results are
>>> not what I expected, and differ from matlab.
>>> My input image is a weird size, 5118x1279, I think numpy fft is not liking it. In
>>> numpy the fft appears to be computed multiple times and tiled across the
>>> output image. In other words the pattern I see in matlab fft is tiled
>>> repeatedly over numpy fft output. Any idea on what I'm doing wrong?
>>> you can see repeated pattern in the top panel of this image which also has
>>> the input in the bottom panel.
>>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p33047057/fft_uex.png fft_uex.png
>>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
More information about the NumPy-Discussion