[Numpy-discussion] missing data discussion round 2

[Mark Wiebe]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Lluís <xscript at gmx.net> wrote:

> Mark Wiebe writes:
> > Why is one "magic" and the other "real"? All of this is already
> > sitting on 100 layers of abstraction above electrons and atoms. If
> > we're talking about "real," maybe we should be programming in machine
> > code or using breadboards with individual transistors.
>
> M-x butterfly RET
>
> http://xkcd.com/378/


Ok, I've run this, how long does it take to execute?

-Mark


>
>
> --
>  "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
>  something new, the whole world becomes that much richer."
>  -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom
>  Tollbooth
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110630/7d795c6e/attachment.html>