[Numpy-discussion] broadcasting behavior for 1.6 (was: Numpy 1.6 schedule)

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Fri Mar 11 11:40:32 EST 2011

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Travis Oliphant <oliphant at enthought.com>wrote:

> This discussion is interesting and useful for NumPy 2.0, but the subtle
> change is not acceptable for NumPy 1.6.
> The rules were consistent, even if seen as unintuitive by some.
> The fact that two libraries we know of already had tests break should be a
> big red warning flag.  There are a lot of other libraries that may have
> tests break.
> Having to fix tests would be expected for NumPy 2.0, but not 1.6.
> I am a big -10 for rolling out a change like this in NumPy 1.6
> For NumPy 2.0, the discussion is interesting, but I am still a -0
Out of curiosity, what do you see as the essential use case for this



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20110311/4568bab8/attachment.html>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list