[Numpy-discussion] Numpy steering group?
matthew.brett at gmail.com
Wed May 4 12:14:26 EDT 2011
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:07, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Ralf Gommers
>> <ralf.gommers at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This is just to follow up on a dead thread of mine a little while back.
>>>> I was asking about letters for Clint Whaley's tenure case, from numpy,
>>>> but I realized that I don't know who 'numpy' is :)
>>>> Is there in fact a numpy steering group? Who is best to write
>>>> letters representing the 'numpy community'?
>>> At http://scipy.org/Developer_Zone there's a list of people under a
>>> big header "steering committee". It seems to me that writing such a
>>> letter representing the community is one of the purposes that
>>> committee could serve.
>> Ah - yes - thanks for the reply.
>> In the interests of general transparency - and given that no-one from
>> that group has replied to this email - how should the group best be
>> addressed? By personal email? That seems to break the open-source
>> matra of everything on-list:
> Having project-relevant *discussions* on-list doesn't preclude getting
> someone's *attention* off-list.
Yes, that's true. My worry was that, having put the question on the
list, and not had an answer, it might send a bad signal if it was
obvious that I had only got a reply because I'd asked for one
> I can't speak for the rest of the group, but as for myself, if you
> would like to draft such a letter, I'm sure I will agree with its
Thank you - sadly I am not confident in deserving your confidence, but
I will do my best to say something sensible. Any objections to a
public google doc?
More information about the NumPy-Discussion