[Numpy-discussion] in the NA discussion, what can we agree on?
ben.root at ou.edu
Fri Nov 4 23:45:00 EDT 2011
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:33 PM, T J <tjhnson at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:43 PM, T J <tjhnson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav at iki.fi> wrote:
>> >> An acid test for proposed rules: given two arrays `a` and `b`,
>> >> a = [1, 2, IGNORED(3), IGNORED(4)]
>> >> b = [10, IGNORED(20), 30, IGNORED(40)]
>> > (A1) Does unmask(a+b) == unmask(b + a) ?
>> > Yes. They both equal:
>> > unmask([11, IGNORED(22), IGNORED(33), IGNORED(44)])
>> > =
>> > [11, 22, 33, 44]
>> Again, I really don't think you're going to be able to sell an API where
>>  + [IGNORED(20)] == [IGNORED(22)]
>> I mean, it's not me you have to convince, it's Gary, Pierre, maybe
>> Benjamin, Lluís, etc. So I could be wrong. But you might want to
>> figure that out first before making plans based on this...
> But this is how np.ma currently does it, except that it doesn't compute
> the payload---it just calls it IGNORED.
> And it seems that this generalizes the way people want it to:
> >>> z = [2, 4] + [IGNORED(20), 3]
> >>> z
> [IGNORED(24), 7]
> >>> z.sum(skip_ignored=True) # True could be the default
> >>> z.sum(skip_ignored=False)
> I guess I am confused because it seems that you implicitly used this same
> rule here:
> Say we have
> >>> a = np.array([1, IGNORED(2), 3])
> >>> b = np.array([10, 20, 30])
> (Here's I'm using IGNORED(2) to mean a value that is currently
> ignored, but if you unmasked it it would have the value 2.)
> Then we have:
> # non-propagating **or** propagating, doesn't matter:
> >>> a + 2
> [3, IGNORED(2), 5]
> That is, element-wise, you had to have done:
> IGNORED(2) + 2 --> IGNORED(2).
> I said it should be equal to IGNORED(4), but the result is still some form
> of ignore. Sorry if I am missing the bigger picture at this point....its
> late and a Fri.
This scheme is actually somewhat intriguing. Not totally convinced, by
intrigued. Unfortunately, I fell behind in the postings by having
dinner... We probably should start a new thread soon with a bunch of this
stuff solidified and stated to give others a chance to hop back into the
game. Maybe a table of some sort with pros/cons (mathematically speaking,
deferring implementation details for later).
I swear, if we can get this to make sense... we should have a Nobel prize
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion